iAlja's Online Hub
I find it quite amusing about how the Android fanboys are reacting to the current “patent wars” among the big tech companies. Poor Google, that little, helpless small company that can’t defend itself… Oh, wait.
Well, if we should feel pity for anyone (and I don’t think we should), it would be Apple, who’s being sued by far more companies. Just take a look at this handy “who’s suing whom” chart and count the number of companies suing Google. Hmmm…
I tend to agree with the advice given by Michael Mace in the linked blog post:
If it bothers you, stop reading the news stories about it. Or sit back and enjoy it as theatre. It’s hardly an important enough issue to justify stripping the patent protection from every small software company in the US.
Though I still dream of the day when companies will focus more of their energies on innovation instead of blatantly copying what Apple does. Yeah, Apple has awesome products, but I’m pretty sure others are capable of awesomeness as well. After all, even Microsoft managed to be innovative with Windows Phone 7 (even though it isn’t selling that well - yet?).
Other recommended readings:
To keep track of my running journey that will hopefully lead me towards a half-marathon and beyond, I recently started a new blog on Tumblr dedicated to running. New followers welcome! :)
How and why I decided to use Tumblr as my online hub.
Great write up on pros and cons of organizing our friends into Circles, Friend Lists and what not. I completely agree with the fact that management of such lists is a huge challenge, and that we are not really good at systemizing people in such an explicit way.
I also don’t think Google’s Circles are the right answer to the problem yet. Yes, they are pretty, but they aren’t really addressing the underlying problems.
Original post and comment on parislemon:
As opposed to a silly and pointless argument as to why Twitter needs to be more like Google+, Kevin Cheng (who happens to work at Twitter), has a really excellent look at Google+’s key feature: Circles.
Cheng gives both positives and negatives about Circles. But overall he seems skeptical not just about Circles, but the whole idea of attempting to organize people online using tools. This is similar to Paul Adams’ (formerly of Google, now of Facebook) thoughts. And this rings true to me.
I’ve been thinking about all of this a lot lately as well. And while I’m far from drawing any clear conclusion, my initial thoughts are that grouping seems to work well for mobile, ephemeral states. This is why group messaging works, and why I think something like Color, while poorly executed, is interesting.
Trying to create explicit groups for you entire social graph and being forced to maintain them just doesn’t seem tenable to me. Some people may think it is now because something like Circles offers a nice-looking tool, but I think as time goes on, they’ll stop maintaining as well.
